themeltingpot

Just another Today.com weblog

&
 

Dec 15 2008

Traffic cam is another excuse to make money

Published by jzbrynn at 9:01 pm under Uncategorized Edit This

From radio, they were discussing the installation of Traffic Camera on every busy street. From the announcement of local authority, it is mainly for the purpose of safety of our local residents, and public safe. But you can’t trust what politicians say. Behind their nice speech, there is might some other reason that they couldn’t tell you straight.

From a newspaper in Detroit, after the installation of Traffic cam, they can generate some million dollars of profit from tickets they issued. Which means that the local government reaping a huge profit from these so - called public safety camera. After this fact is published, other states follow suit. They did the same pattern to every busy streets. They mainly focus on cars that is from out of states, because the politicians afraid to angered their constituents in the local. Basically, these installation of traffic cam is for the purpose of making money from our hard - working citizens.

Other interesting facts that you might want to know. The installation of these traffic cams was provided by an Australian company, and the tickets issuing also from the same company. For every ticket issued, this Australian company taking $30, and the rest goes to the local government. What a shame.

Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

One Response to “Traffic cam is another excuse to make money”

  1. skwguitaron 15 Dec 2008 at 10:07 pm edit this

    That is a shame… you know, I went into this post thinking I might have to cite some driving fatality statistics or something, but you’re right. In this time of recession, the last thing we need to be doing is doling out 30 dollars to Australia everytime someone gets a ticket…

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not A Member? Register for Free!

Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.